10x
Deliberation velocity
Series Pre-Seed · Alignment Infrastructure · Human-in-the-Loop
CCC is an AI-native, community-led deliberation layer that unlocks stakeholder alignment through a proprietary conversation-first primitive. Purpose-built for the post-AGI transition. Radically simple. Infinitely scalable. Deeply human.
Get started freeTalk to salesSeven buzzwords and no verb that describes an action a person takes. "Unlocks stakeholder alignment" means someone talked to someone. "Proprietary primitive" means a conversation, which has been public domain for roughly two hundred thousand years.
"Get started free" and "Talk to sales" both go to the same page, because there is no sales. There is no free tier either, because there is no paid tier. There is a text box.
Trusted by teams at
Nobody. Zero organizations use this. Zero have heard of it. The grey boxes are the honest version of every logo wall you have scrolled past, which is a list of companies that once took a meeting.
10x
Deliberation velocity
99.9%
Uptime SLA
$0
Cost per seat
0
Answers collected
10x is measured against nothing. 99.9% is one small server and a promise. $0 per seat is technically true and describes every website ever made.
The fourth number is real and it is the reason this page is a joke. An archive with nothing in it is a beautiful room with nobody in it.
Frictionless zero-config activation via our conversational interface layer.
Leverage asynchronous peer-to-peer human touchpoints across your network graph.
Compounding network effects drive exponential reach with no marginal infrastructure spend.
1. Answer a question. 2. Ask one other person the same question. 3. They can then ask someone, and you are no longer needed for it to continue.
This is the part the short page threads between people's answers. Here it is end to end.
The question was always: what would you do with the extra time?Dario Amodei, We Must Pace the Frontier
He answers it in full for the companies building these systems. Interpretability, evaluations, safeguards, each one staffed and budgeted. Everyone outside those companies appears once, in a clause about public deliberation, with no method attached. The time is worth buying because society will use it well, and how society uses it is left blank.
If one person asks another who they want to exist,
Then the second person's next action changes.
Because a conversation is the smallest thing that reliably changes what someone does next.
Check Ask them in a week what they did differently.
If those answers are written down in their own words, with their name and permission,
Then a public answer to that question exists that no lab wrote.
Because named words from real people are evidence. A summary is one person's reading.
Check The archive itself. Every entry carries a name. The count is visible.
If that public answer exists and is easy to read,
Then people setting the pace have something concrete to point at when they say society should have a say.
Because an argument resting on public deliberation gets stronger once the deliberation is visible.
Check Whether anyone with a hand on the pace reads it and cites it.
If each conversation leaves behind a person able to hold the next one,
Then the number of people who can sit in a hard room and say the true thing grows, with no funding and no permission.
Because that is what practice does.
Check Second-generation entries, from people who were the listener in someone else's conversation.
It would have been very hard, I think, for a small, narrow group of people sort of entrusted with the authority to make the same thing happen.Ajeya Cotra, 80,000 Hours Podcast, 20 October 2025
Link three is the one I trust least. A shelf of honest answers changes nothing until someone inside reads it and lets it move a decision, and there is no evidence yet that this happens. The record of public comment on hard technical questions says it mostly does not.
Running it anyway. The first two links hold on their own.
NONE OF THESE PEOPLE EXIST. THAT IS THE POINT OF THIS SECTION.
"CCC 10x'd our deliberation throughput in under a sprint. Game changer."
Invented Person, VP of Synergy, Company That Is Not Real
"Finally, a solution that speaks to where the puck is going."
Fictional Executive, Fake Holdings
"I have not used this and I am quoted anyway. Standard practice."
Nobody At All, Nowhere
Because a real testimonial from a person who did the thing is the single hardest asset to fake and the easiest to check. Every page that has fake ones is telling you it could not get real ones.
The short page has an archive instead. When it fills, it is the testimonial section, and every line in it is somebody's actual answer with their actual name.
$0
forever
$0
forever
$0
forever
There is nothing to buy, no account to make, no email captured, and no tier that unlocks anything. The pricing table exists so you can see how much of one is usually theatre.
One person, a text box, and a small server. The day it becomes an organization is the day the first version stopped working.
Nobody. It costs about the price of a coffee per month to run.
Two people, both verbatim, both linked to where they said it. Both remain strangers to this page.
It waits unpublished until a person reads it. Your name appears when you tick the box. The server keeps your words and a salted hash for rate limiting, and that is the entire record.
Because the short version is the real one, and the fastest way to show that is to build the version that would get funded.
The real page asks who you want to exist, and gives you a box to answer in. It costs about fifteen minutes across a whole week, and none of those fifteen minutes happen on a website.
The short version